Inbox: I’m sure the Packers would be cool with that

Jim from Eau Claire, WI

Let’s hope we aren’t “Sleepless in Seattle.” Sorry, I will see myself out.

Just couldn’t help yourself, could you?

Al from Green Bay, WI

Yes, we know. The Packers have had some dark moments in Seattle. Ancient history, and this young Packers team doesn’t care. They are looking for a rebound win. Reasons to believe: 1) Have you noticed? The offense has posted 30-plus points three games in a row. They’re rolling. 2) Health. Getting Romeo Doubs back is huge. 3) The ‘Hawks home-field advantage has faded, as they are 3-4 at home this year. 4) No picks thrown by Jordan Love in three straight games bodes well for this and future games. GPG!

That was then, this is now. Not only is nobody left from the 2014 roster or coaching staff, but Kenny Clark and Jaire Alexander are the only two players who have even played in Seattle while wearing a Packers uniform. Likewise, Lumen Field has been a difficult place to play, but as noted the Seahawks are 3-4 there this year. Vibes are different these days. Hopefully, Green Bay starts a new streak Sunday night.

Dan from San Antonio, TX

With Alexander and Javon Bullard ruled out, how do you think the secondary lines up? Does Keisean Nixon go to the slot with Carrington Valentine and Eric Stokeson the boundaries? Or could we see Kalen King in the slot and leave Nixon outside?

I think it depends on the status of Corey Ballentine (knee), who’s the only questionable player for Sunday night. Ballentine has been a key reserve on both the perimeter and slot the past two years and could play either position depending on where the Packers want to line Nixon up. It’s possible Green Bay rolls with Nixon inside, too, and uses Valentine and Stokes outside. The Packers have a plan but Matt LaFleur wasn’t showing his cards Friday.

Doug from Salem, OR

I record every Packers game I can and watch multiple times when I can’t sleep. If that doesn’t make me a Packers lunatic, I don’t know what will! Despite all the weapons, I think the offense really misses Romeo Doubs. It’s probably scheme and talent, but he is very skilled at getting open in the middle of the field. Hopefully, he will be back on the field Sunday (obviously) and his presence will also help open more opportunities for his fellow receivers.

Doubs is a big piece. Like Al said, it would be big for Green Bay to get the third-year wideout back for the stretch run.

Craig from Sussex, WI

We’re seeing the true Matt LaFleur offense with Jordan Love at quarterback, more run-oriented. I see a lot of similarities with 49ers and Rams. And that is a good thing!

And it makes Love better. For whatever reason, there’s this narrative that teams with franchise quarterbacks must ride those QBs into the dirt. It’s not true. There are 10 other guys on the field contributing to the success of the offense.

Mike from Winchester, TN

Hi II, I haven’t seen Seattle’s “12th Man” mentioned as much this season. I assume it’s still a thing, but is it something that the Packers are concerned with?

I fully expect that stadium to be rocking. The Seahawks bring a ton of momentum into this game after winning four straight.

Dan from Algonquin, IL

Hi Wes, I believe this week’s game against the Seahawks will be won in the trenches, which is the foundation where most good and bad outcomes are made possible during games. How does our O-line match up with their D-line, and how does our D-line match up with their O-line? Any tasty mismatches to exploit?

It’s a favorable matchup, but Seattle did good things on both sides of the ball in last week’s 30-18 win over Arizona. Geno Smith has been sacked 40 times for 272 lost yards this season but was barely touched (no sacks, two quarterback hits). The Packers’ defensive front has been playing better as of late, too. I think Kenny Clark and inside pressure are going to be huge in this game. Offensively, the Packers must keep tabs on Leonard Williams’ location and where he’s rushing from.

Theresa from Sylvania, OH

Xavier McKinney started the season on fire with his interceptions and then cooled off recently. How much of the cooling could be correlated to the loss of Jaire? Does the defensive game plan have to shift which limits the X factor? Or are offenses scheming differently and we need to counter?

I think that has do with teams not throwing deep. McKinney only has defensed a pass (two vs. San Francisco) in one of his last five games and picked the pass off.

Tim from Pepin, WI